European Student Think Tank on Facebook European Student Think Tank on Twitter

The Myths about Turkey: Part II

Apr 3rd, 2011 | By Serkan Bulut | Tags: , , ,

Myth II: The socio-economic his­tory of Tur­key is totally dis­con­nec­ted from Europe!

There could be many reas­ons to voice such a claim but the two most strik­ing are as such; you are either com­pletely unin­formed about the Turkish-European social-economic-political his­tory or you know this claim is not true but you think the Europeans are so naïve that they would buy it and even see this as a reason why Tur­key should not be a part of the EU.

Pro­ponents of such argu­ments are act­ing as if the Turks appeared on earth in the last dec­ade. They seem to think that never in the his­tory the Turks and the nations of Medi­ter­ranean and “con­tin­ental” Europe mingled, traded, lived together and fought each other. Through war, com­merce, inter-marriage, archi­tec­tural design, the inter­ming­ling of cuisine, and myriad other ways, this ‘zone of civil­iz­a­tion’ has shared a com­mon des­tiny with Turks for over a thou­sand years.[1] Just by look­ing at the his­tory and inter­na­tional rela­tions lit­er­at­ure pro­duced on Turkish/Ottoman and European polit­ical, eco­nomic and social rela­tions you can tell that these two entit­ies are far from being dis­con­nec­ted. On the con­trary they have been shap­ing and re-shaping each other’s iden­tity for centuries.    

Let’s jump to the last cen­tury espe­cially after World War II. It has been 60 years since the French For­eign Min­is­ter Robert Schu­man presen­ted a plan for deeper cooper­a­tion in Europe on May 1950. On this day, which later on star­ted to be cel­eb­rated as Europe Day, the found­a­tion was laid for the European Coal and Steel Com­munity (ECSC) and, a few years later, the European Eco­nomic Com­munity (EEC).Turkey made its first move towards the European fam­ily in 1959 with its applic­a­tion to the EEC. Since then formal and informal, polit­ical, social, cul­tural and eco­nomic rela­tions con­tin­ued unabated and evolved from basic inter-state inter­ac­tion to deep multi-level cooper­a­tion con­sist­ing of gov­ern­mental as well as non-governmental and soci­etal act­ors. In the past 60 years the mag­nitude of eco­nomic rela­tions has increased tre­mend­ously, and the mobil­ity of goods has been ensured with cus­toms union arrange­ments which have had an immense pos­it­ive impact on com­merce for both sides of the deal. The cooper­a­tion among the Turk­ish and European gov­ern­ments are multi-faceted and take place on mul­tiple plat­forms; UN, NATO, OSCE, OECD just being a few of them. In addi­tion to these, more import­antly, social, cul­tural and edu­ca­tional inter­ac­tion has been bring­ing the sides ever closer. So when someone claims that the socio-economic his­tory of Tur­key and Europe are dis­con­nec­ted from each other, one needs to come up with his­tor­ical and con­tem­por­ary evid­ence to back this claim. Oth­er­wise it’s much ado about nothing. 


[1] Selim Deringil, “The Turks and Europe: The Argu­ment from His­tory‟, Middle Eastern Studies,Vol. 43 No. 5, 2007, pp. 709-23.

Related posts:

  1. The Myths about Tur­key: Part I
    April 1st, 2011
  2. The Myths about Tur­key: Part IV
    April 9th, 2011
  3. The Myths about Tur­key: Part III
    April 5th, 2011
  4. Rethink­ing the EU’s future: Two play­ers of a game, Tur­key and the EU
    March 14th, 2012
  5. Turkey-EU Rela­tions at Crit­ical Cross­road
    Octo­ber 17th, 2012

One Comment to “The Myths about Turkey: Part II”

  1. Matthijs Hannink says:

    I think you are overly eager to make your point and you are vastly exag­ger­at­ing any sort of claim against a ‘shared his­tory’. I think nobody at all states that Turks are totally dis­con­nec­ted from Europeans and have noth­ing to do with them. You think those people are there but fail to men­tion them. And nobody denies that there is trade between Tur­key and Europe, or that both Tur­key and Europe are both mem­bers of some inter­na­tional organizations.

    I think what you are doing is cre­at­ing ima­gin­ary, irra­tional anti-Turkish Europeans and argue vir­u­lently against them. How­ever, nobody is says that these his­tor­ies are ‘totally dis­con­nec­ted’. The things you men­tion are com­mon knowledge.

    There are some his­tor­ical dif­fer­ences between Tur­key and the rest of Europe though. One is the geo­graphy, bor­der­ing Asia/the Arab world. Another is reli­gion. Still another is its his­tory with an abund­ancy of coups and wars on Cyprus and against the Kurds. Yet another is its nation­al­ist and mil­it­ar­istic roots and Atatürk’s per­son­al­ity cult, unknown in recent European culture/history. This recent his­tor­ical nar­rat­ive imports a tra­di­tional European ‘export product’ (nation­al­ism) with an Islamic coun­try. I think this is the main ele­ment that dis­tin­guishes Tur­key from Europe.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting